| | | RssFeeds
 
Get NetworkComputing Connect Search   Search Search
 
NWC Print
Nov 2008
Beyond Headlines
Buzzcut
Editorial
Cover Story
On the Record
Show Case
Interop 2009
Lateral View
In-Depth
On Location
Down to Business
Techmall
Book Review
In Passing
Last Mile
Archieve
 

Amazon Cloud Adds Persistent Storage Feature


Customers will likely use Amazon's Elastic Block Store for a variety of things, including as a cloud-based database holding up to 1 TB of data.

 By J. Nicholas Hoover, InformationWeek, Aug. 22 2008, 1130 hrs

Amazon greatly expanded the use cases for its Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2) utility computing service Thursday by adding a persistent storage feature called Elastic Block Store or EBS, making EC2 more reliable and scalable to entice new customers and a broader range of applications.



Before the release of EBS, storage in an EC2 instance was deleted the second that instance shut down, unless the EC2 user had created a manual workaround to tie EC2 to Amazon's Simple Storage Service (S3). That meant that hardware failures caused data loss, and people couldn't scale down their EC2 usage temporarily for risk of losing data or increase use greatly because of storage limitations.


Now, however, users can mount a persistent virtual storage "device" that acts much like an unformatted hard drive and then create a file system on top of it or use it as raw, unstructured storage that runs independently but related to EC2 instances. "As an EC2 instance is to a traditional server, an EBS instance is to a traditional disk," Adam Selipsky, VP of product management and developer relations for Amazon Web Services. Users can store up to 1 TB of data in a single instance of EBS and can scale to as many EBS instances as they need.


The new feature also instantly makes EC2 more reliable, since the storage is now decoupled from the computing resources and is automatically replicated to prevent data loss if hardware fails. Amazon estimates EBS volumes will be 10 times more reliable than commodity hard drives.


Customers will likely use EBS for a variety of things, including as a cloud-based database for an app running on EC2, storage area networking as a service via EBS' distributed file system possibilities, a reliable test bed for Web applications, and Web hosting. In an early example, developer Eric Hammond has created a guide for those looking to run MySQL on Amazon EC2. Applications like that could make corporations take a harder look at the service for business use.


Among those testing EBS are Wired.com/CondeNet, which uses EC2 to host embeddable widgets and Wired product reviews.


"EBS is the missing link -- the last piece in the cloud computing puzzle -- that enables start-ups and large corporations alike to conjure the resources they need to build any application possible," Paul Fisher, manager of technology for Wired.com/CondeNet, said in a statement. "Persistence is key to most applications, and EBS provides more flexibility in this area than anything previously available."


However, despite making data more reliable and EC2 more flexible, EBS does nothing to quell concerns over Amazon's Web services' availability. Last month, Amazon S3 was down for most of a day, forcing the company to offer refunds for breaking service level agreements that require the services to be up and accessible.


In a blog post, Amazon CTO Werner Vogels said the company sees the possibility of customers using EBS and S3 in tandem for storage management because of a feature that allows users to create snapshots of data at a certain point in time, store them in S3 and then use them for back-up and rolling back data to previous versions.


Amazon claims EBS will also be faster than the previous "ephemeral" EC2 storage, with lower latency and better throughput. EBS may be cheaper for some, too. It costs 10 cents per GB per month and 10 cents per million requests for a file or data. In an example presented on Amazon's site, a Website that has a 100 GB database and averages 100 I/Os per second during a month would spend only $10 monthly on storage and $26 monthly in throughput costs. Previously, developers also had to pay for a whole EC2 instance and all the storage that went with it, rather than a small amount of storage if, say, they only required a 10 GB database.


InformationWeek has written a "Guide to Cloud Computing" that details the cloud offerings and strategies of Amazon, Salesforce, Microsoft, and five other providers.Click here to view the report (registration required). 

Print this Page   E-mail this Page
RATE THIS ARTICLE
 Worse   Better 
Comment:*
First Name:*
Last Name:*
Company:
City:*
E-mail:*
Verification Code:*

Type the characters you see in the picture above.
 
  Reset

Comments >>

1
No Comments to display

Disclaimer >>

 
 CIO Perspectives >>

“Always look for simpler solutions to challenges and be the first to make decision in your area of specialization”

Satish Das, CSO and Director-ERM, Cognizant

 

More: CIO Perspectives >>


 FEATURED STORIES >>

Data Center Encryption Is Key To Security

And key management is crucial for your encryption plan to succeed

 

Inside 1&1's Giant Web Hosting Data Center

Photos of the ISP's newly green data center in Kansas reveal the infrastructure behind the Web host's strategically located facility

 

Largest Core Banking Rollout in Indian Co-operative Banking Sector

Punjab State Co-op Bank has selected Flexcube, Oracle Database and Oracle Financial Services OnDemand to replace manual processes and enhance efficiency by maintaining customer intimacy  created over the years

 

CAST YOUR VOTE>>

Will hardware requirements reduce when companies deploy virtualization solutions?



View Polls Archive
ADVERTISEMENTS >>
 
Powered By: ssCMS 2.2.0.0